Weekly devel tree testing status

From Ext4
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
This is weekly ext4 devel tree/branch testing status. Feel free to contact me for anything related at caiqian (at) redhat.com
 +
== week 36 ==
 +
* top commit: ad4eec61 (No update)
 +
* platform: Intel, AMD, Power7, Z10, KVM
 +
* tests: xfstests, ltp, fs_mark, openposix_testsuite
 +
 +
No issue.
 +
== week 35 ==
 +
* top commit: ad4eec61
 +
* platform: Intel, AMD, Power7, Z10, KVM
 +
* tests: xfstests, ltp, fs_mark, openposix_testsuite
 +
 +
No issues.
 +
 +
== week 34 ==
 +
* top commit: e9b81fca
 +
* platform: Intel, AMD, Power7, Z10, KVM
 +
* tests: xfstests, ltp, fs_mark, openposix_testsuite
 +
 +
No issues.
 +
 +
== week 33 ==
 +
 +
Skiped due to some infrastructure issue.
 +
 +
 +
== week 30 ==
 +
* top commit: 4a8603e
 +
* platform: Intel, AMD, Power7, Z10, KVM
 +
* tests: xfstests, ltp, fs_mark, openposix_testsuite
 +
 +
Compile error:
 +
    fs/ext4/ialloc.c:792:4: error: label ‘next_inode’ used but not defined
 +
        goto next_inode;
 +
 +
== week 29 ==
 +
* top commit: 3223fd
 +
* platform: Intel, AMD, Power7, Z10, KVM
 +
* tests: xfstests, ltp, fs_mark, openposix_testsuite
 +
 +
No issue.
 +
 +
== week 28 ==
 +
* top commit: e8974c
 +
* platform: Intel, AMD, Power7, Z10, KVM
 +
* tests: xfstests, ltp, fs_mark, openposix_testsuite
 +
 +
No issue.
 +
 +
== week 27 ==
 +
* top commit: 6ae06ff
 +
* platform: Intel, AMD, Power7, Z10, KVM
 +
* tests: xfstests, ltp, fs_mark, openposix_testsuite
 +
 +
No issue.
 +
 +
== week 26 ==
 +
* top commit: 03d5b8b
 +
* platform: Intel, AMD, Power7, Z10, KVM
 +
* tests: xfstests, ltp, fs_mark, openposix_testsuite
 +
 +
No issue.
 +
 +
== week 25 ==
 +
* top commit: 9c68048
 +
* platform: Intel, AMD, Power7, Z10, KVM
 +
* tests: xfstests, ltp, fs_mark, openposix_testsuite
 +
 +
No issue.
 +
 +
== week 24 ==
 +
* top commit: e4ae5ad
 +
* platform: Intel, AMD, Power7, Z10, KVM
 +
* tests: xfstests, ltp, fs_mark, openposix_testsuite
 +
 +
No issue.
 +
 +
== week 23 ==
 +
* top commit: 74039f2
 +
* platform: Intel, AMD, Power7, Z10, KVM
 +
* tests: xfstests, ltp, fs_mark, openposix_testsuite
 +
 +
The pttest test triggered kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3352! which may just be a false alarm.
 +
 
== week 22 ==
 
== week 22 ==
 
  * top commit: 822a976
 
  * top commit: 822a976

Latest revision as of 05:19, 24 September 2013

This is weekly ext4 devel tree/branch testing status. Feel free to contact me for anything related at caiqian (at) redhat.com

Contents

[edit] week 36

* top commit: ad4eec61 (No update)
* platform: Intel, AMD, Power7, Z10, KVM
* tests: xfstests, ltp, fs_mark, openposix_testsuite
No issue.

[edit] week 35

* top commit: ad4eec61
* platform: Intel, AMD, Power7, Z10, KVM
* tests: xfstests, ltp, fs_mark, openposix_testsuite
No issues.

[edit] week 34

* top commit: e9b81fca
* platform: Intel, AMD, Power7, Z10, KVM
* tests: xfstests, ltp, fs_mark, openposix_testsuite

No issues.

[edit] week 33

Skiped due to some infrastructure issue.


[edit] week 30

* top commit: 4a8603e
* platform: Intel, AMD, Power7, Z10, KVM
* tests: xfstests, ltp, fs_mark, openposix_testsuite

Compile error:

   fs/ext4/ialloc.c:792:4: error: label ‘next_inode’ used but not defined
       goto next_inode;

[edit] week 29

* top commit: 3223fd
* platform: Intel, AMD, Power7, Z10, KVM
* tests: xfstests, ltp, fs_mark, openposix_testsuite

No issue.

[edit] week 28

* top commit: e8974c
* platform: Intel, AMD, Power7, Z10, KVM
* tests: xfstests, ltp, fs_mark, openposix_testsuite

No issue.

[edit] week 27

* top commit: 6ae06ff
* platform: Intel, AMD, Power7, Z10, KVM
* tests: xfstests, ltp, fs_mark, openposix_testsuite

No issue.

[edit] week 26

* top commit: 03d5b8b
* platform: Intel, AMD, Power7, Z10, KVM
* tests: xfstests, ltp, fs_mark, openposix_testsuite

No issue.

[edit] week 25

* top commit: 9c68048
* platform: Intel, AMD, Power7, Z10, KVM
* tests: xfstests, ltp, fs_mark, openposix_testsuite

No issue.

[edit] week 24

* top commit: e4ae5ad
* platform: Intel, AMD, Power7, Z10, KVM
* tests: xfstests, ltp, fs_mark, openposix_testsuite

No issue.

[edit] week 23

* top commit: 74039f2
* platform: Intel, AMD, Power7, Z10, KVM
* tests: xfstests, ltp, fs_mark, openposix_testsuite

The pttest test triggered kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3352! which may just be a false alarm.

[edit] week 22

* top commit: 822a976
* platform: Intel, AMD, Power7, Z10, KVM
* tests: xfstests, ltp, fs_mark, openposix_testsuite

No issue.

[edit] week 21

* top commit: e2555fd
* platform: Intel, AMD, Power7, Z10, KVM
* tests: xfstests, ltp, fs_mark, openposix_testsuite

xfstest 224 basically started to kill random processes but never finished which is unlikely ext4 related.

[edit] week 20

Skipped due to travel.

[edit] week 19

* top commit: e615573
* platform: Intel, AMD, Power7, Z10, KVM
* tests: xfstests, ltp, fs_mark, openposix_testsuite

No issue.

[edit] week 18

Skipped due to no change.

[edit] week 17

* top commit: 0d606e2
* platform: Intel, AMD, Power7, Z10, KVM
* tests: xfstests, ltp, fs_mark, openposix_testsuite

Issues:

* WARNING: at fs/ext4/inode.c:3222: yet to reproduce.
Personal tools